Labels:book | poster | reckoner | sky | tree OCR: Welch Texas Dep't of Highways and Pub Transp 483 U. 468 494 (1987) and Arizona V Rumsey 467 U.S 203 212 (1984)) Moreover because Izumi isking the Coun to overrule statutory construction, its burden L even greater as Congress remains free to act the Court has misconstrued the authority Congress sought to bestow 172-73: see also Hilton South Carolina Pub Rys Comm 112 560 565 (1991) ("doctrine stare decisis most compelling' when the issue is ne ot statutory construction) Izumi presents ro special circumstances here that would justify departure from established precedent The fact that Izumi 10 Sears wish tc use the judgments collaterally in another acti ion the only justifi fication Izumi presents for denying vacatur no from the circumstances 11 any other case where the judgment had 1 not been ...
(.png)
